You are here:
23 September 2021 / news

Trend report: Shareholder disclosure requirements for related party transactions

How to deal with shareholder disclosure requirements when entering into related party transactions in privately held Dutch companies? Based on recent developments in Dutch case law, this trend report provides practical guidance to help mitigate exposure to litigation challenging such transactions due to shareholder disclosure requirements not being met.

Litigation-Trend-Report

Developments in shareholder disclosure requirements

In a number of recent judgments, the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal established that a company’s duty of care towards its shareholders may require that such shareholders are duly and timely informed of conflict transactions. This may in turn require that the company proactively informs its shareholders prior to entering into the relevant transaction, even if the shareholders have not (yet) posed any questions.

Relevant cases generally related to transactions concluded between the company and its majority or controlling shareholders(s) that were represented at board level. The company’s duty of care is intended to protect (typically: minority) shareholders without board representation, who otherwise would not – or, at least, not timely – be informed of these transactions that could arguably prejudice their position.

Mitigating exposure to litigation

Noting a tendency towards broadening the scope of conflicts of interests doctrine regarding related party transactions, generally a more prudent approach should be taken. Duly observing such shareholder disclosure requirements, if applicable, and the other measures set out in this trend report may help mitigate the risk of shareholders successfully challenging related party transactions.

Want to learn more? A trend report in which we share our thoughts on how this development may impact Dutch corporate governance standards, is freely available below.


Contacts

For more information, please reach out to Bastiaan Cornelisse, Mijke Sinninghe Damsté, Michel van Agt, Bastiaan Kemp or Philippe Hezer.

 



Genoteerd-fdi-blauw

New FDI screening mechanisms in the Netherlands

The Netherlands recently introduced two FDI screening mechanisms that will have significant impact on the transaction practice... read more
letstalklegal-blue

Shareholder activism: Minority rights and shareholder lawsuits

Changes to minority rights and shareholder lawsuits potentially affecting shareholder activism in Switzerland in the future. read more
finma-guideline

FINMA Guideline - Changes of corporate bodies at banks

The FINMA Guidelines explain the procedure regarding changes of corporate bodies at banks. read more