You are here:
21 May 2019 / news

AutomotiveBit: ECJ: input VAT recovery on fueling costs confirmed

On May 15 2019, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) confirmed in the Vega case (C-235/18) that only the actual recipient of the fuel is entitled to recover VAT on fuel costs. This ruling does not affect the current Dutch practice.

Mobility budget has (finally) entered into force

The case concerned an Austrian parent company who provided fuel cards to its Polish subsidiary. The Polish subsidiary could use these cards to buy fuel. However, the fuel supplier invoiced the parent company. The parent company subsequently charged the costs of the fuel to its subsidiary and applied for a VAT-refund for the VAT paid to the fuel supplier from the Polish Tax Authorities. The Tax authorities refused the refund. The Polish referring Court asked the ECJ whether the parent company provided a (VAT-exempt) financing service to its subsidiary or a supply of fuel and consequently has the right to a refund of VAT.

The ECJ ruled that the parent company has not purchased and supplied fuel, but provided a (VAT-exempt) financing service. The subsidiary should be considered as the recipient of the fuel and is entitled to recover VAT on fuel costs. This is in line with the earlier Auto Lease Holland case (C-185/01).

The facts of the Vega case are very similar to the situation in which a card company or a leasing company - like the parent company - incurs and on-charges costs to the actual user of the card (the driver / lessee). In our view, the Vega case should however not affect the current Dutch practice of these businesses. Recently, the secretary of Finance issued in this respect a decree in which he explicitly confirms that in Dutch practice card companies are entitled to recover input VAT, provided that some conditions are met (see our bit of 11 July 2018).

Please contact your regular Loyens & Loeff adviser for further information.

Follow our Showcase Page on LinkedIn for updates and more AutomotiveBits.


2% real estate transfer tax applies to DIY plots

The 2% rate should be applied to residential property and addressed the problem of rates for transformations. read more

A combined purchase and construction agreement does not qualify as a delivery of a construction site for VAT purposes

The Court of Justice ruled in the KPC Herning case that the delivery of a plot of land containing a warehouse that could still be used at the time of delivery... read more
Financial Paperwork

2% real estate transfer tax applies for a building without doors, windows or roof

An immovable property continues to qualify as a dwelling for real estate transfer tax at the time when damage and dereliction have occurred. read more