You are here:
25 June 2020 / article

Do's and dont's of regulating third-party litigation funding: Singapore vs. France

Opting for international arbitration no longer ensures a quicker and cheaper access to justice. By reason of the exponential increase of the costs incurred in arbitration proceedings, a claim constitutes both a financial asset and a burden. A number of products offered by disputes funding firms allows litigants to externalize these costs. Funding cases puts equity capital at risk on a non-recourse basis. Naturally, this follows a well-structured decision-making process involving a budget plan and a deep dive due diligence conducted by experienced litigation and finance teams.

arbitration France & Singapore - court gavel calculator

Different approaches to regulating the funding activity have emerged. While France adopted a hands-off approach which led to the development of ethical and professional standards by concerned stakeholders, Singapore successfully legislated and developed an inspiring model, allowing the activity to thrive in the litigants’ best interests, in record time.

Take a closer look at this chapter here!

This article has been published in the Asian International Arbitration Journal



business people in building - New draft bill to reform the Luxembourg arbitration law

Reform of the Luxembourg arbitration law

Draft bill reforming the arbitration provisions in the Luxembourg Code of Civil Procedure. read more
Business meeting between two men - Article ASA Marquais

Considerations for Third-Party Litigation Funders in Luxembourg

Litigants seeking financing to bring forward or defend a dispute may now contact over thirty professional funders read more

Your guide to commercial arbitration in Luxembourg

Luxembourg has developed a solid judicial system and regulations to handle any commercial arbitration. read more