You are here:
25 June 2020 / article

Do's and dont's of regulating third-party litigation funding: Singapore vs. France

Opting for international arbitration no longer ensures a quicker and cheaper access to justice. By reason of the exponential increase of the costs incurred in arbitration proceedings, a claim constitutes both a financial asset and a burden. A number of products offered by disputes funding firms allows litigants to externalize these costs. Funding cases puts equity capital at risk on a non-recourse basis. Naturally, this follows a well-structured decision-making process involving a budget plan and a deep dive due diligence conducted by experienced litigation and finance teams.

arbitration France & Singapore - court gavel calculator

Different approaches to regulating the funding activity have emerged. While France adopted a hands-off approach which led to the development of ethical and professional standards by concerned stakeholders, Singapore successfully legislated and developed an inspiring model, allowing the activity to thrive in the litigants’ best interests, in record time.

Take a closer look at this chapter here!

This article has been published in the Asian International Arbitration Journal



Business meeting between two men - Article ASA Marquais

Considerations for Third-Party Litigation Funders in Luxembourg

Litigants seeking financing to bring forward or defend a dispute may now contact over thirty professional funders read more

COVID-19 and insurance in our home markets

Here you find the factsheet of COVID-19 and insurance in all our home markets. read more
Benchmark-litigation-award-2020-logo

Another win at the Benchmark Europe Awards 2020!

Our Litigation team was awarded the ‘The National Dispute Resolution Firm of the Year’ for the second time in a row. read more