You are here:
01 March 2018 / news

Belgian Constitutional Court decides on Fairness Tax

On 1 March 2018, the Belgian Constitutional Court annulled the Belgian fairness tax. The Court however limited the retroactive effect of the annulment, unless in the specific situation of the redistribution of a dividend.

Belgian Constitutional Court decides on Fairness Tax

Background

The fairness tax is a separate tax of 5,15% on distributed profits which have not been effectively taxed as a result of the notional interest deduction and/or tax losses carried forward. On 31 January 2014 a request for annulment was introduced before the Belgian Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) with a request for a preliminary ruling. On 17 May 2017 the ECJ decided that the fairness tax violated Article 4 of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD) to the extent a resident company redistributes dividends in a taxable period following the taxable period in which it received these dividends.

Decision of the Constitutional Court and consequences

The Court decides that the way in which the fairness tax is determined violates the Articles 10, 11 and 172 of the Belgian Constitution which guarantee equality and non-discrimination. Since the calculation of the fairness tax becomes unworkable in view of this violation, the Court annuls the fairness tax entirely. The annulment is binding from the moment the decision of the Court is published in the Belgian Official Journal.

In general the annulment has retroactive effect, which means that the annulled act is deemed to never have existed. For financial reasons, the Court however decided to moderate the retroactive effect in this particular case. For assessment years 2014-2018, the effects of the annulled act are maintained. This implies that the fairness tax cannot be recovered for those years. The retroactive effect is nonetheless maintained with respect to the situation that a Belgian company redistributes a dividend since this was considered incompatible with the PSD by the ECJ.



Update on Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment of the Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 proposals

On 13 February 2020, experts from the OECD’s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration and Economics Department provided an update on the preliminary economic... read more

Overview: MLI choices made by the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and Switzerland

On 7 June 2017, the multilateral instrument (MLI) was signed covering 68 jurisdictions. In the meantime multiple other jurisdictions have signed the MLI raising... read more
Ceiling - Loyens & Loeff Real Estate

Optional VAT regime for leases

On 1 January 2019, the new optional VAT regime for immovable leases entered into force. For lease agreements that came into effect before 5 December 2019, the... read more
Stay informed

Don't miss out. Stay up to date about our latest news and events.

Stay informed